Many people who had been reported to have died from cancer actually died from the treatment and not the disease. This was the case of former White House Press Secretary, Tony Snow. In 2005, Snow had his colon removed and underwent six months of chemotherapy.

Then in 2007, he underwent surgery to remove a growth in his abdominal area, near the site of the original cancer. Dr. Allyson Ocean, said, "This is a very treatable condition and because of therapies we have, patients are able to work and live full lives with quality while being treated".

She went on to say, "Anyone who looks at this as a death sentence is wrong". Well we now know, that Dr. Ocean was dead wrong. Tony Snow just died recently. What is really interesting is the media claimed he died of colon cancer, although they knew he didn't have a colon anymore.

What apparently happened was the cancer returned and spread to the liver and elsewhere in his body. The colon surgery severely restricted his normal eliminative functions and overburdened the liver and tissue fluids with toxic waste.

The previous series of chemotherapy treatments inflamed and damaged a large number of cells in his body, and also impaired his immune system. Without a healthy immune system, there is the possibility that this could cause other diseases to develop. That is probably the reason that new cancers grew in the liver and other parts of Tony's body.

Does mainstream media ever report that there is overwhelming proof that shows chemotherapy has zero benefits? How many oncologists stand up for patients to protect them from chemotherapy, which they know, could cause them to die sooner from the treatments than the disease itself?

Can you really trust your life in the hands of a doctor when you know most of them would not consider chemotherapy if they had cancer themselves? The news is spreading fast that physician-caused fatalities now exceed 750,000 each year.

The side effects of chemotherapy treatment are horrendous and heart breaking for patients and their loved ones. Although the drug treatment comes with the promise to improve the patients quality of life, it is just common sense that a drug that could make them throw up and lose their hair, while wrecking their immune system, is doing the exact opposite.

Chemotherapy's deadly poisons inflame every part of the body. The drugs can slough off the entire lining of their intestine. The most common side effect experienced among chemo-patients is their complete lack of energy.

Chemo-drugs can dramatically decrease your red blood cells levels. This reduces oxygen availability to the 60-100 trillion cells in your body. You can literally feel the energy zapped from every cell in your body – a physical death without dying.

In 1990, the highly respected German epidemiologist, Dr. Ulrich Abel from the Tumor Clinic at the University of Heidelberg, conducted the most comprehensive investigation of every major clinical study on chemotherapy drugs ever done.

Able contacted 350 medical centers and ask them to send him anything they had ever published on chemotherapy. He also reviewed and analyzed thousands of scientific articles published in the most prestigious medical journals.

It took Abel several years to collect and evaluate the data. Abel's study, which was published on August 10, 1991, in The Lancet, should have alerted every doctor and cancer patient about the risks of one of the most common treatments used for cancer and other diseases.

In his report, Abel came to the conclusion that the overall success rate of chemotherapy was "appalling." According to this report, there was not scientific evidence available in any existing study to show that chemotherapy can "extend in any appreciable way the lives of patients suffering from the most common organic cancers".

Abel points out that chemotherapy rarely improves the quality of life. He describes chemotherapy as a "scientific wasteland" and states that even though there is no scientific evidence that chemotherapy works, neither doctor nor patient is willing to give up on it.

The mainstream media has never reported anything about this very important study. But why would they? The media is controlled by the enormous vested interest of the groups that sponsor them; in this case, it's the pharmaceutical companies.

What a shame! Will we ever get this situation corrected? Not until enough citizens rise up and voice their opinions loud and clear.

Sonny Julius

Sonnyj@TheSunnySenior.com

www.HealthyIdeas.homestead .com